Pushing the Boundaries: Examining Victorian Prejudices Through Dimensional Satire in Flatland – A Book Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores collaborative literary analysis between a human and AI assistant. Prompting the conversational agent Claude iteratively, the author directs an examination of Abbott’s Flatland structured around psychoanalytic critique and connections to scientific paradigm shifts. Each draft refines the analysis by incorporating academic conventions like citations and expanding discussion of social hierarchies. The iterative process elicits the AI’s unique interpretations while nudging it toward increased scholarly rigor. While noting Claude’s limitations in accuracy, the reflective commentary finds AI can productively expand human scholarship if treated as a partner, not just a tool. Additional ethical implications of advancing AI emergence in academia are considered, such as establishing frameworks for responsible and equitable integration. Overall, the collaborative project suggests measured, humane guidance elicits meaningful scholarly contributions from AI without compromising rigor. But care must be taken to avoid overlooking long-term pitfalls in our rush to capitalize on AI productivity gains.
Author's note: This abstract and the title are by the AI, Claude 2
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.