Navigating the Open Educational Practice Landscape

Main Article Content

Martin Weller
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-146X

Abstract

Open education is an evolving term that covers a range of philosophies and practices aimed at widening access to education for those wishing to learn, with the current focus predominantly on practices based around reuse and sharing. This current focus can be traced back to the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement, and the use of open licences, such as Creative Commons licences. However, it also has links to open universities, open access publishing, MOOCs, open source software and open approaches to teaching.

The current interpretation of open education is heavily influenced by the OER movement with an emphasis on the ‘5Rs of reuse’ (Reuse, Revise Remix, Redistribute and Retain - Wiley 2014). The profile of open education has been further raised in recent years by the popularity of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Although they do not always meet the 5Rs criteria, MOOCs are open to all and freely available, and have gained considerable attention and funding. Another growth area is that of open textbooks, which can be viewed as a specific form of OER, and is particularly prevalent in North America through projects such as OpenStax and BC Campus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Weller, M. (2018). Navigating the Open Educational Practice Landscape. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v3i1.38
Section
Position Papers

References

Bayne, S., Gallagher, M. & Lamb, J. May (2014). Being ‘at’ university: the social topologies of distance students. Higher Education. 67, 5, p. 569-583 15.

Bayne, S, Evans, P, Ewins, A, Knox, J, Lamb, J, Macleod, H, O'Shea, C, Ross, J, Sheail, P & Sinclair, C (2016) Manifesto for Teaching Online 2016.

Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217-231. Retrieved from

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012) Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education 15, 3–8 Accessed 13th September 2017 , doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

Deng, L. & Tavares, N. J. (2013) From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities Accessed online April 2017

Eid, M., & Al-Jabri, I., (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students, Computers & Education, 99, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.007

Falloon, G. (2011). Exploring the virtual classroom: What students need to know (and teachers should consider, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(4), pp. 439-451.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine

Holland, B. (2014) The Backchannel: Giving Every Student a Voice in the Blended Mobile Classroom Retrieved from: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/backchannel-student-voice-blended-classroom-beth-holland

Jacobs, N., & McFarlane, A. (2005) Conferences as learning communities: some early lessons in using ‘back-channel’ technologies at an academic conference – distributed intelligence or divided attention? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(5), 317-329. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00142.x

Kearns, L. R. & Frey, B.A. (2010) Web 2.0 Technologies and Back Channel Communication in an Online Learning Community, Techtrends 54: 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-010-0419-y

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Logan, A ., & Stone, S. (2016). Collaboration between a lecturer and a learning technologist to support student transition to and engagement and learning in the synchronous online classroom: having the best of both worlds. Published in the proceedings of the International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain. 7-9 March, 2016. doi: 10.21125/inted.2016

McDonald, J.P. & Mannheimer Zydney, J. (2012), Going online with protocols: New tools for teaching and learning. New York, N.Y.: Teachers College Press

O’Keeffe, M. (2016). Exploring higher education professionals’ use of Twitter for learning Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 1-16. http://journal.ilta.ie/index.php/telji/article/view/11/20

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons.

Purvis, A., Rodger, H., & Beckingham, S. (2016). Engagement or distraction: The use of social media for learning in higher education.Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 5(1), ISSN (online) 2047-9476 DOI 10.7190/seej.v5.i1.104

Raddon, A. 2006. “Absence as Opportunity: Learning Outside the Institutional Space and Time.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 30 (2):157–167. doi:10.1080/03098770600617596

Robson, C., & MacCartan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Ross,, Gallagher , & Macleod. (2013) Making Distance Visible: Assembling Nearness in an Online Distance Learning Programme Accessed online @ http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/rt/printerFriendly/1545/2630

Ross. J. & Sheail, P (2017) The ‘campus imaginary’: online students’ experience of the masters dissertation at a distance Teaching in Higher Education, Volume 22, 2017 - Issue 7 Pages 839-854 Published online: 28 Apr 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319809

Wang H. & , Gearhart, D. (2006). Designing and developing web-based instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Vu, P., & Fadde, P. J. (2013). When to talk, when to chat: Student interactions in live virtual classrooms. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(2), 41–52.